Neutral Ground
BlindspotAbout
Neutral Ground

Synthesized by AI from sources across the political spectrum. Every story, every side.

AI-Generated Content
How it works →
Back
CrimePoliticsConflict

Grand Jury Rejects Justice Department Attempt to Indict Six Democratic Lawmakers

Synthesized from Washington Post, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and 3 others
Wednesday, February 11, 2026·—
Grand Jury Rejects Justice Department Attempt to Indict Six Democratic Lawmakers
Source: The White House from Washington, DC / Public Domain

Key Facts

  • A federal grand jury in Washington, D.C., declined to indict six Democratic lawmakers on Tuesday.
  • The lawmakers involved are Mark Kelly, Elissa Slotkin, Chris Deluzio, Chrissy Houlahan, Maggie Goodlander, and Jason Crow.
  • The investigation concerned a November video advising military and intelligence personnel to refuse illegal orders.
  • President Trump previously called for the lawmakers to be jailed, accusing them of sedition.
  • Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is attempting to retroactively demote Senator Mark Kelly over the video.
  • The U.S. Attorney’s office in Washington is led by Jeanine Pirro.

A federal grand jury in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday refused to indict six Democratic lawmakers who released a video advising military personnel to refuse illegal orders. The decision blocks the Justice Department's attempt to bring criminal charges against Senators Mark Kelly and Elissa Slotkin, as well as Representatives Chris Deluzio, Chrissy Houlahan, Maggie Goodlander, and Jason Crow. All six lawmakers previously served in the military or intelligence agencies.

The investigation centered on a 90-second video posted in November in which the lawmakers told service members they must refuse orders that violate the law or the Constitution. President Donald Trump had previously labeled the group "traitors" and accused them of "sedition at the highest level," suggesting they should face imprisonment. Following the grand jury's decision, Senator Kelly described the pursuit of charges as an "outrageous abuse of power," while Senator Slotkin stated the move was a victory for the rule of law.

The U.S. Attorney’s office in Washington, led by Jeanine Pirro, authorized the attempt to secure the indictment. While the grand jury declined to sign off on the charges on Tuesday, legal observers noted that prosecutors could still attempt to secure an indictment in the future. The lawmakers maintained that their video simply quoted existing law regarding military protocol.

Historical Context

The legal dispute began after the lawmakers released a video stating that the military's oath is to the Constitution rather than an individual. In response, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth censured Senator Mark Kelly and moved to retroactively demote him from his retired rank of Navy captain, arguing that retired officers receiving pensions remain subject to military justice. Kelly has since filed a lawsuit to block the demotion, which he characterizes as unconstitutional retribution.

Perspective Analysis

Narrative Conflict: Left-leaning US media and International outlets framed the grand jury's decision as a "rebuke" of the administration's attempts to politicize the justice system, while Right-leaning US media highlighted a lawmaker's failure to provide a specific example of an illegal order when questioned in a televised interview.
Omission: Right-leaning US media omitted the fact that the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia is a long-time political ally of the President.

Sources: Washington Post · The Hill · New York Times · South China Morning Post · Wall Street Journal · Fox News | Aggregators: Global Conflict Monitor

Always verify important information with primary sources.

Related Stories

Crime

Ramaphosa deploys South African military to combat gang violence and illegal mining

Crime

ICE Director Discloses 37 Misconduct Probes Following Fatal Shootings of US Citizens

Crime

FBI Doubles Reward to $100,000 and Releases Suspect Details in Nancy Guthrie Abduction